data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69efa/69efa4ae081e8e847514caec2e5c8259d8bb6fd3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50d3c/50d3cc9ee292b84e1f665ac7d81a064cab2aeef8" alt="Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”"
Vrinda Sehgal
Nov 13, 2020
Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”
The Hon’ble Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in the case of Red Bull AG v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited & Ors., dismissed...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e1ac/2e1ac04ed70b34a066dd49d55e50e76feed265b6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47bf9/47bf9dc0c8bc49303ffef33289c5394188652e3b" alt="INDIA: IPAB holds PCT declaration under Rule 4.17 (ii) acceptable as a Proof of right Requirement"
Shivarpita Nailwal
Oct 31, 2020
INDIA: IPAB holds PCT declaration under Rule 4.17 (ii) acceptable as a Proof of right Requirement
IPAB holds that the inventor declaration filed under Rule 4.17 (ii) of the PCT Regulations is sufficient to establish Proof of right.