bukhara | candcip

top of page

Chadha & Chadha IP

info@candcip.com

Delhi High Court: “Bukhara” Declared A “Well-Known Trade Mark” In Contrast To The US Judgements

Sharabh Shrivastava

Dec 15, 2022

Delhi High Court: “Bukhara” Declared A “Well-Known Trade Mark” In Contrast To The US Judgements

OVERVIEW In a recent suit for trade mark infringement and passing off as well as cancellation petitions preferred by ITC Limited (“the...

Featured Posts

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

Digital Health

Digital Health

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

Recent Posts

Digital Dilemmas: Trademark Protection and Liability in India’s Online Market

AI-Generated Inventions and Patentability: Navigating Legal Implications

Understanding the Legal Battle Over LINAGLIPTIN: A Case Study on Patent

Customs: Frontline Guardians in the Battle Against Cross-Border Counterfeits

Protecting Local Innovation

Code, Courts, and Conundrums: Traversing The Shifting Sands of Section 3(k)

"Ensuring Fairness in Patent Adjudication: Madras High Court Emphasizes need for Reasoned Orders and Natural Justice"

IPR and Public Health: Exploring the Possibility of Local Production of Risdiplam in India

INDIA: Unlawful Publication of Withdrawn Applications: Not Admissible as Prior Art

India: another one bites the dust - unreasoned refusal order for non-attendance at a hearing

Archive

Search By Tags

Follow Us

bottom of page