#IndianDesign

top of page

Chadha & Chadha IP

info@candcip.com

INDIA: IPO PROVIDES CLARIFICATION PERTAINING TO CLASSIFICATION OF DESIGN APPLICATIONS

Chetan Chadha

Aug 18, 2015

INDIA: IPO PROVIDES CLARIFICATION PERTAINING TO CLASSIFICATION OF DESIGN APPLICATIONS

The Indian Patent Office (IPO) issued a circular on August 18, 2015, providing a clarification on the subsisting practice of registration...

Featured Posts

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

Digital Health

Digital Health

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

Recent Posts

Delhi High Court upholds rejection by the Indian Patent Office and clarifies disclosure requirements for microbiology applications

‘Beauty of Joseon’ Highlights the Beauty of Intent

INDIA- Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act: Comprehending identification of "A Known Substance"

E-Commerce and Counterfeits: Court Takes Strict Stance on Amazon's Intermediary Liability

Artificial Intelligence meets Trademark Law: Unpacking Consumer Autonomy and Keyword Advertising

INDIA: Delhi High Court Clarifies the ‘Technical Effect’ Requirement Under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act

Digital Dilemmas: Trademark Protection and Liability in India’s Online Market

AI-Generated Inventions and Patentability: Navigating Legal Implications

Understanding the Legal Battle Over LINAGLIPTIN: A Case Study on Patent

Customs: Frontline Guardians in the Battle Against Cross-Border Counterfeits

Archive

Search By Tags

Follow Us

bottom of page