Changes in Law

India: Analysis of the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024 and IPO’s comments/ clarifications

Shivarpita Nailwal

Mar 19

India: Analysis of the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024 and IPO’s comments/ clarifications

The Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry has notified and published the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024 (the “Rules”) on March 15,...

India: Divisional Patent Applications-Delhi High Court Clarifies The Scope

Nanki Arneja

Oct 25, 2023

India: Divisional Patent Applications-Delhi High Court Clarifies The Scope

This is a follow-up to our previous report (see here), wherein we reported that in an appeal filed by Syngenta Limited against a refusal...

Architectural Works in the Intellectual Property Regime

Alisha Rastogi

Sep 11, 2023

Architectural Works in the Intellectual Property Regime

Introduction With the ever-evolving paradigms of visual depiction, what constitutes protection of origin is a dynamic concept. It is...

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

Gaurvi Arora

Aug 30, 2023

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

Loveleen Kaur

Aug 28, 2023

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

The Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry has proposed and published Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 (the “draft Rules”) on...

INDIA: HC confirms synergistic combinations leading to new and improved results are patentable

Aastha Joshi

Aug 25, 2023

INDIA: HC confirms synergistic combinations leading to new and improved results are patentable

Introduction In a detailed order dated March 13, 2023, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court (hereinafter referred to as "the Hon'ble Court") in...

INDIA: High Court interprets Section 3(d) clarifies the scope of patentability of known processes

Aastha Joshi

Aug 25, 2023

INDIA: High Court interprets Section 3(d) clarifies the scope of patentability of known processes

INTRODUCTION: In an order dated March 10, 2023, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court (hereinafter referred to as "the Hon'ble Court") in Tapas...

Inclusion of Algorithms or computer-executable instructions in inventions is not barred under S.3(k)

Namrata Dua and Ishita Kapoor

Aug 24, 2023

Inclusion of Algorithms or computer-executable instructions in inventions is not barred under S.3(k)

Inclusion of Algorithms or computer-executable instructions in inventions is not barred under S.3(k) In a recent judgment concerning an...

Revocation of plant variety registration of PepsiCo India’s potato variant upheld by the High Court

Ashee Singh

Aug 23, 2023

Revocation of plant variety registration of PepsiCo India’s potato variant upheld by the High Court

Introduction: In one of the first revocation-related action taken by the Indian courts under the Protection of Plant Varieties and...

HC Clarifies: Patent Revocation Petition Not a 'Suit' and Unlikely for Stay under S. 10 CPC

Mehak Parvez

Aug 23, 2023

HC Clarifies: Patent Revocation Petition Not a 'Suit' and Unlikely for Stay under S. 10 CPC

In a recent case of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr. vs. The Controller of Patents & Ors. [C.O.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 3/2021], the Delhi...

1

2 3 4 5

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

Digital Health

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

Regulating The Conduct of Patent Agents in Light of Instances of Negligence

Registration Not a License to Monopolize: Prior Use Trumps Trademark Rights

In the Ring: 'BOROLINE' Scores a Knockout Against 'BOROBEAUTY’

CONTEMPT OF COURT UNVEILED: PIDILITE v. PREMIER STATIONERY – A CASE OF DEFIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT

A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING IN INDIA & USA

Smells Like Trouble, Yet No Trademark Battle? - Scent Dupes And Their Legal Conundrum

OTT Platforms and Breach of Their IP Rights By “Cyberlockers”

INDIA: HIGH COURT REASONS AGAINST UNREASONED ORDERS BY THE IPO

Fashion Thrifting and the Intellectual Property Rights Landscape

NO TWO CROCODILES IN ONE RIVER: DELHI HIGH COURT UPHOLDS LACOSTE’S TRADE MARK RIGHTS IN ITS LOGO

info@candcip.com

Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive

Search By Tags

Follow Us

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy