IPAB holds claims of divisional application must be derived from claims of the parent application and not merely from the specification

IPAB holds that the inventor declaration filed under Rule 4.17 (ii) of the PCT Regulations is sufficient to establish Proof of right.

INTRODUCTION The digital era has created another platform for brand owners to engage with the public and to assert the presence of their...

3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is the process of creating a 3D solid object through the sequential layering of...

The Ministry of Commerce and Industry has notified the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2020 to further amend the Patents Rules, 2003. The Draft...

INTRODUCTION In the current world, User Experience (UX) design is the bedrock part of software and website development companies and in...

INTRODUCTION In an attempt to streamline patent litigation, the High Court of Delhi has notified Draft Rules (The High Court of Delhi...

Store layouts are one of the emerging non conventional trademarks. The examines the recent trends regarding extension of IP rights with...

Introduction Visual perception plays a very important role in enabling the customers to form an association of a product with a...

In India, computer-related inventions can be protected under the Copyright Act and the Patent Act. While computer software is protectable...